A Take-Two Director Sold 334 Shares Under a February Plan

by 6Charts Team Category: news 7 min read

A ledger entry on a standing beat, written so that the exculpatory fact comes first rather than last. Footnote F1 of the filing reads, verbatim, Sale of shares pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan adopted by the D and E Living Trust and the EFS 2020 Irrevocable Trust on February 19, 2026. A plan adopted seven months before a trade is the ordinary and lawful mechanism by which insiders sell on a schedule they do not control, so the proximity to the 17 September annual meeting is a consequence of the calendar rather than of a September decision. The filing answered HTTP 200 at 6,080 bytes and was read independently by two researchers. This desk's own arithmetic puts the two lines at 334 shares and 73,323.02 US dollars gross against 8,571 shares held directly. Kept secondary: the annual meeting vote tallies had not been filed as of 2026-09-18T03:13:18Z, verified three times across twelve minutes against the EDGAR submissions API and cross-checked on two other endpoints, with last year's equivalent filed the calendar day after the meeting.

A Take-Two Interactive director sold 334 shares on 15 September 2026, two days before the annual meeting at which she stood for re-election. The Form 4 reporting it landed at the Securities and Exchange Commission on 16 September. The filing says on its face that the sale was made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan adopted on 19 February 2026, seven months before the trade, which is the ordinary and lawful mechanism by which company insiders sell on a schedule they do not control. That sentence goes first because without it every other sentence in this piece would be an insinuation. This runs as a ledger item on a standing beat, and nothing more. What does the Form 4 actually say? CONFIRMED, read directly from the filing XML by two researchers working independently of each other. The document answered HTTP 200 at 6,080 bytes, read at 2026-09-18T03:00:04Z and again at 03:02:00Z. Its filing index answered HTTP 200 at 7,980 bytes at 03:01:48Z. Reporting person: Siminoff Ellen F, CIK 0001386430, a director of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Relationship flags: isDirector set to 1. No officer flag. Period of report: 2026-09-15. Signature date: 2026-09-16. Filed: 2026-09-16, EDGAR acceptance stamp 16:13:21, accession 0000946581-26-000082. Plan flag: aff10b5One set to 1, which is the box a filer ticks to state the trade was made under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. TransactionDateCodeSharesPrice per shareHeldOwned after Sale of common stock2026-09-15S167USD 219.53By the D&E Living Trust1,499 Sale of common stock2026-09-15S167USD 219.53By the EFS 2020 Irrevocable Trust1,499 A separate non-derivative holding line on the same filing reports 8,571 shares held directly. This desk's own arithmetic: 167 plus 167 is 334 shares, and 334 multiplied by 219.53 is 73,323.02 US dollars gross. The filing itself states no total. What does the 10b5-1 footnote say? CONFIRMED, quoted verbatim from footnote F1 of the filing: Sale of shares pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan adopted by the D&E Living Trust and the EFS 2020 Irrevocable Trust on February 19, 2026. Footnote F2, also verbatim: Shares held directly by the D&E Living Trust. The Reporting Person and David Siminoff serve as co-trustees and retain voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the D&E Living Trust. And the signature line, verbatim: "/s/ Aaron Diamond, attorney-in-fact for Ms. Ellen F. Siminoff", dated 2026-09-16. Does the timing mean anything? No, and the filing is the reason it does not. A Rule 10b5-1 plan is specifically designed to remove discretion over timing. An insider adopts it at a moment when they are permitted to trade, sets the schedule, and then the trades execute whether or not the insider would choose that week. A plan adopted on 19 February 2026 produced a sale on 15 September 2026. The proximity to the 17 September annual meeting is a consequence of the calendar, not of a decision taken in September. The size says the same thing. 334 shares against 8,571 held directly and 2,998 across the two trusts is a trim. It is not an exit, it says nothing about anyone's view of Grand Theft Auto 6, and this desk is not going to pretend otherwise. For the one comparison the public record does offer: at the 2025 annual meeting, this director received 149,847,879 votes for and 1,196,570 against, the second-highest for-vote of the ten directors on the ballot, read from last year's results filing at HTTP 200 and 65,402 bytes at 2026-09-18T03:00:42Z. Have the 2026 annual meeting vote results been filed? CONFIRMED as not found, checked three times across twelve minutes. This is secondary context to the Form 4 above, and it is carried carefully because a missing filing is the easiest thing in financial journalism to over-read. Take-Two held its 2026 annual meeting on 17 September 2026. The certified vote tallies on each proposal are reported to the SEC on a Form 8-K under Item 5.07. As of the last check, no such filing exists on the public record. data.sec.gov/submissions/CIK0000946581.json answered HTTP 200 at 158,129 bytes at 2026-09-18T03:01:29Z, at 03:08:47Z and at 03:13:18Z, identical on all three pulls. Filtering the recent filings array for form 8-K with a September 2026 filing date returns an empty list every time. The most recent Take-Two filing of any type is the Form 4 above. The EDGAR company browse feed for 8-K filings answered HTTP 200 at 18,287 bytes at 03:01:43Z. Most recent 8-K listed: 2026-08-07. The ones before it are 2026-05-21, 2026-02-03, 2025-11-06 and 2025-09-19. EDGAR full-text search for the company across forms 8-K between 16 and 18 September 2026 answered HTTP 200 at 1,050 bytes at 03:01:45Z with "hits":{"total":{"value":0,"relation":"eq"},"hits":[]}. Last year, the equivalent filing arrived the calendar day after the meeting. The 2025 annual meeting 8-K carries a period of report of 2025-09-18, was filed 2025-09-19 with an EDGAR acceptance stamp of 2025-09-19 16:30:18, and lists three items verbatim: "Item 5.02: Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers: Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers", "Item 5.07: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders" and "Item 9.01: Financial Statements and Exhibits". That index answered HTTP 200 at 9,788 bytes at 2026-09-18T03:02:03Z. Take-Two is not late. It is simply not early. Item 5.07 is due within four business days of the meeting. This desk's own arithmetic, counting business days from Thursday 17 September 2026: Friday 18, Monday 21, Tuesday 22, Wednesday 23 September. Three of those four remain. One limit on that count, printed because it is a real one. The SEC's own Form 8-K instruction document came down at HTTP 200 and 1,075,450 bytes at 2026-09-18T03:01:09Z, but no text extraction tool was available in this environment, so the four business day rule above is carried as a researcher's statement of the rule rather than as an instruction anyone here read off the document. The 23 September date is arithmetic on that stated rule and on nothing else. What else did Take-Two file this week? CONFIRMED as not found. Nothing. The Form 4 described above is the company's only SEC filing in the 16 to 18 September window across three EDGAR endpoints. Separately, Take-Two's investor newsroom answered HTTP 200 at 477,387 bytes at 2026-09-18T03:05:00Z and carries no press release dated 16, 17 or 18 September 2026. The most recent is 10 September 2026, announcing the webcast of the annual meeting. Its events and presentations page returned HTTP 404 at 13,578 bytes at 03:07:57Z, so no meeting webcast replay could be checked, and a separate investor events route returned HTTP 403 at 405 bytes at 03:04:53Z. What this does not prove It proves nothing about anyone's view of Grand Theft Auto 6. A scheduled 334 share trim under a plan adopted in February is not a signal, and this article is not presenting it as one. The 219.53 figure is not a market close. It is the per-share transaction price as reported on the filing. The two identical 167-share lines with identical 1,499-share balances are unusual on their face and are consistent with two symmetrically funded trusts under one plan. Nobody here has a basis to call it a filing defect. The missing 8-K does not mean results are being withheld, that any proposal failed, or that anything is wrong. Four business days is the rule and three of them remain. No vote count on any 2026 proposal appears anywhere in this article, because none has been filed. The meeting is not confirmed by filing. What this desk has is the 10 September press release announcing the webcast and press accounts of the meeting, not a filing confirming that it convened as scheduled. EDGAR can lag acceptance by minutes, so a filing made in the minutes around any one check could in principle be missed. That is why the submissions index was pulled three times across twelve minutes and cross-checked against two other endpoints. No press coverage of this Form 4 was found at all, so this article does not say another outlet got it wrong. It says nobody appears to have reported it. The standing Form 4 beat runs through the 4 September filings and the second sale under a plan, with the largest example of the same mechanism at this piece and the plan calendar itself reconstructed at this correction. One outlet getting a Form 4 badly wrong on 17 September is documented at this piece, and the meeting these filings sit around is at our proxy coverage and the pay ratio piece. More on the news desk, background on the GTA 6 wiki, and the servers list and leaderboards are open.